Independent CrowdStrike Falcon configuration assessment.
A structured review of endpoint coverage, policies, exclusions, access, detection operations and workflow configuration—with clear evidence and prioritized remediation guidance.
What the health check can cover.
We tailor the review to the Falcon capabilities you have licensed and deployed.
| Domain | Example review areas | Typical output |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor coverage | Missing/stale hosts, OS support, version drift, deployment gaps | Coverage and version findings |
| Prevention policies | Settings, scope, precedence, disabled controls, consistency | Policy risk findings |
| Sensor updates | Update rings, version alignment, stale sensors | Update posture findings |
| Exclusions | ML, IOA, Sensor Visibility and other exclusions; scope and justification | Exclusion hygiene findings |
| Host groups | Assignment logic, dynamic groups, policy mapping | Configuration drift findings |
| Identity & RBAC | Admin roles, dormant access, least privilege, SSO/MFA considerations | Access-control findings |
| Detection operations | Backlog, triage process, closure workflow, escalation | Operational findings |
| RTR | Access model, permissions, governance, auditability | Response governance findings |
| Fusion & notifications | Alert routing, escalation, workflow automation | Workflow findings |
| Optional modules | Firewall, Device Control, Identity, Discover, NG-SIEM and others | Module-specific findings |
A low-friction assessment process.
Scope
Confirm endpoint count, Falcon modules, environments, CIDs and goals.
Collect
Use agreed read-only API access or customer-provided exports. No write access is required for a standard health check.
Assess
Evaluate configuration and operational evidence using Securevector’s assessment methodology.
Report
Deliver executive findings, a technical workbook and a prioritized roadmap.
Review
Walk through results and practical remediation priorities with the team.
SV-EXC-001 — Overly broad visibility exclusion
High
Observation: A visibility-impacting exclusion is applied more broadly than the documented business requirement appears to need.
Evidence: Exclusion value, applied scope, creation metadata and affected host groups.
Recommendation: Validate the business need, reduce scope to the minimum required and use a narrower exclusion type where appropriate.
What your team receives.
Executive report
Posture summary, risk themes, key findings and a concise 30/60/90-day roadmap.
Technical findings workbook
Detailed findings with severity, evidence, impact, recommendation, owner and status.
Review session
A working session to explain findings and prioritize next steps.